From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Scheck <singularsyntax(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TODO links broken? |
Date: | 2013-04-17 12:48:02 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEzfofMtWxraYoPpyy2sc4ArvDhN58xzX=Z9t9++QUxGCQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Stephen Scheck
> <singularsyntax(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Many of the links in the TODO wiki page result in a "page not found" error.
>> Is this page up-to-date?
>> Can anything be inferred about the status of these items from the broken
>> link?
>
> I think what we can infer is that the new archives code is broken. I
> hope someone is planning to fix that. If there's been some decision
Yes. We can infer that. It makes it a whole lot easier to fix
something with better bug repors than that, of course, as I'm sure you
(Robert in this case, not Stephen) are generally aware of.
I've reverted a patch that was applied a few days ago that dealt with
how URLs are parsed, and I think that's the one that's responsible.
But it would be good to have an actual example of what didn't work,
because the links i tried all worked...
> made that we don't have to support the historical URLs for our
> archives pages, I think that's a really bad plan; those links are in a
> lot more places than just the Todo.
No, the plan has always been to support those. There are no plans to
remove that.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-04-17 13:11:12 | Re: Inconsistent DB data in Streaming Replication |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-04-17 12:13:06 | Re: TODO links broken? |