From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Stephen Scheck <singularsyntax(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TODO links broken? |
Date: | 2013-04-17 13:14:14 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY8mXj1dX+bu8K=9g9efD-ohW+y0rjQjJ-J6bDmA=Ws=A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Yes. We can infer that. It makes it a whole lot easier to fix
> something with better bug repors than that, of course, as I'm sure you
> (Robert in this case, not Stephen) are generally aware of.
>
> I've reverted a patch that was applied a few days ago that dealt with
> how URLs are parsed, and I think that's the one that's responsible.
> But it would be good to have an actual example of what didn't work,
> because the links i tried all worked...
Hmm. Sorry for the lack of detail. I assumed the problem was obvious
and widespread because I clicked on the first link I saw in the Todo
and it didn't work. But after clicking a bunch more links from the
Todo, I only found three that fail.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-12/msg01340.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg01831.php
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4B577E9F.8000505%40dunslane.net/
That last one works if I change %40 to @, so that one might be a wiki
problem rather than an archives problem. In fact, for all I know the
other two might have been broken all along too; I'm just assuming they
used to work.
Sorry for going overboard,
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2013-04-17 13:23:12 | Re: TODO links broken? |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-04-17 13:11:12 | Re: Inconsistent DB data in Streaming Replication |