| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "zhangjie2(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <zhangjie2(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Patch] change the default value of shared_buffers in postgresql.conf.sample |
| Date: | 2021-08-18 18:27:19 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEzcDuZVqvXB_V3a3=XsCZCR8apn+MVSqAPjZ1rr+q_B9Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:16 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 02:03:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > I think the only question is whether this is a PG 15-only patch or a
> > > patckpatch to PG 10; I am in favor of the later.
> >
> > I think you need a lot stronger argument that this is a bug
> > before you consider back-patching user-visible behavioral
> > changes.
>
> I think the only logic to backpatching it is your statement that this is
> cosmetic, and the new cosmetic appearance is more accurate. However, if
> you don't feel we need to backpatch, that is fine with me --- we have
> gotten very few complaints about this.
+1 for making the change ,and +1 for making it in master only, no backpatch.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-08-18 18:28:56 | Re: strange case of "if ((a & b))" |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2021-08-18 18:19:21 | Re: RFC: Improve CPU cache locality of syscache searches |