Re: [Patch] change the default value of shared_buffers in postgresql.conf.sample

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "zhangjie2(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <zhangjie2(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] change the default value of shared_buffers in postgresql.conf.sample
Date: 2021-08-23 16:33:52
Message-ID: 20210823163352.GA30537@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 08:27:19PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:16 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 02:03:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > > I think the only question is whether this is a PG 15-only patch or a
> > > > patckpatch to PG 10; I am in favor of the later.
> > >
> > > I think you need a lot stronger argument that this is a bug
> > > before you consider back-patching user-visible behavioral
> > > changes.
> >
> > I think the only logic to backpatching it is your statement that this is
> > cosmetic, and the new cosmetic appearance is more accurate. However, if
> > you don't feel we need to backpatch, that is fine with me --- we have
> > gotten very few complaints about this.
>
> +1 for making the change ,and +1 for making it in master only, no backpatch.

Patch applied to master.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2021-08-23 16:44:24 pretty slow merge-join due rescan?
Previous Message alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org 2021-08-23 16:31:48 Re: archive status ".ready" files may be created too early