Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [translators] [press-regional] 9.6 Release Translations

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:

> On 09/29/2016 10:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Euler Taveira wrote:
> >>> On 29-09-2016 10:42, Gabriele Bartolini wrote:
> >>>> if I click here https://www.postgresql.org/about/press/presskit96/
> >>>> unfortunately I am not redirected to the Italian page (which exists
> and
> >>>> is here: https://www.postgresql.org/about/press/presskit96/it/) I am
> >>>> not sure content negotiation is working properly.
> >>>>
> >>> If you go About > Press, you see all translation links available. I
> >>> agree with you that a link inside every translated press would be good.
> >
> > I previously said:
> > I think the only reasonable option is that the pgweb code fills in the
> > list of available translations in front of each one, based on the files
> > that exist in the server. Perhaps the way to do this would be to put
> > the translations in the database; that would also make it easier to add
> > new translations as they arrive.
> >
> > Obviously, it's not something that's to happen for 9.6, but if someone
> > is willing to hack pgweb for pg10 ...
> >
> > One more thing I just noticed. If you go to the front page, the
> > featured content box has links to the announcement, but it is not
> > possible to get to the translated release kits, nor there is any
> > indication that they exist at all. I don't think this has been properly
> > considered.
>
> I was operating under the assumption that the translationed versions
> showed up automatically, as they did on the old website code. I wasn't
> aware that they didn't, anymore. In 4 years (or more)? this is the
> first time anyone has brought it up.
>

I think you actually have to go back two generations of the website code
for that. Which is definitely more than 4 years..

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/