| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, nawaz(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: typo |
| Date: | 2018-11-26 09:35:47 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEzMNPcWdZhhpAr1j0EZZGBsDM0_aM0PJLFb6G7h-sHXjw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:42 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:17:06AM +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:
> > On 26/11/2018 08:03, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Are you sure that's right? To me the original wording of that sentence
> >> seems to convey the message properly, and the update done does not?
> >
> > Yeah, I just found this on the committers list and I disagree with the
> > change as well.
>
> [... checking around ...]
> Hm. I have read the sentence and the surroundings a couple of times
> before doing anything, and using an adverb looked clearer than the
> adjective. Is an adjective more appropriate than an adverb here because
> it insists more on the fact that each row is involved? Just trying to
> grab the difference.
>
If the current text is unclear to people we should definitely fix it --
just to the right thing.
Maybe say something like "keep inline in the regular table rows" instead?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-11-26 14:14:18 | Re: typo |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-11-26 07:42:38 | Re: typo |