From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends |
Date: | 2011-08-15 15:54:53 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEzHQRjvczGPHGrJAfbNf4W-S9KpO_4fmU=owwBYyRSixg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:53, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:20, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> However, for a narrow fix, I could see moving the data type definition
>>> to someplace with fewer dependencies. Perhaps split it into a separate
>>> file timestamp_type.h, or something like that.
>
>> Yes, that seems to fix the problem of timestamptz. See the attached
>> patch - seems ok?
>
> Don't think you should expose fsec_t, nor most of those macros. The
> foo_per_bar values are just namespace clutter.
Hmm, ok. I just went for what seemed like a reasonable subset. I do
also need the SECS_PER_DAY and those constants in order to be able to
convert the timestamp value. That led me to include the other
foo_per_bar so they are all in one place - seems wrong to have them
split up.
>> I also ran into a similar problem with some WAL macro definitions that
>> are in xlog_internal.h. I've moved them to xlogdefs.h in the attached
>> xlog.diff file. Does that seem ok as well, or should I move them
>> somewhere else?
>
> I don't like the idea of exposing those to frontends, either. What do
> you actually *need* out of that, and why?
PrevLogSeg - which also brings in XLogSegsPerFile.
XLogFileName
XLogFileSize - which brings in XLogSegsPerFile and XLogSegSize
PrevLogSeg should be self explaining, as should xlogfilename.
XLogFileSize is required by XLByteAdvance() which is already in
xlogdefs.h - so xlogdefs.h actually has a hidden dependency on
xlog_internal.h here today.
I can certainly separate those out, but it seemed more clean to move
the whole block they were in.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Singer | 2011-08-15 15:56:39 | Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-08-15 14:56:00 | Re: synchronized snapshots |