From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends |
Date: | 2011-08-15 14:53:55 |
Message-ID: | 3103.1313420035@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 16:20, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> However, for a narrow fix, I could see moving the data type definition
>> to someplace with fewer dependencies. Perhaps split it into a separate
>> file timestamp_type.h, or something like that.
> Yes, that seems to fix the problem of timestamptz. See the attached
> patch - seems ok?
Don't think you should expose fsec_t, nor most of those macros. The
foo_per_bar values are just namespace clutter.
> I also ran into a similar problem with some WAL macro definitions that
> are in xlog_internal.h. I've moved them to xlogdefs.h in the attached
> xlog.diff file. Does that seem ok as well, or should I move them
> somewhere else?
I don't like the idea of exposing those to frontends, either. What do
you actually *need* out of that, and why?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-08-15 14:56:00 | Re: synchronized snapshots |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-08-15 14:44:33 | Re: walprotocol.h vs frontends |