Re: "unexpected EOF" messages

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> Heh - we already used ERRCODE_CONNECTION_FAILURE on the errors in
>> copy.c. Since COPY can only happen when there is a transaction
>> (right?), I just changed those error messages for consistency.
>
> Agreed on changing the message texts to match, but I wonder whether
> we ought not switch all those SQLSTATEs to something different.  Per my
> comment to Kevin, I think the whole 08 class is meant to be issued on
> the client side.  Maybe it's okay to conflate a server-detected
> connection loss with client-detected loss, but I'm not convinced.

Sure,that's a simple search and replace of course... If we can come to
a decision about what codes to actually use. I'm not sure I have much
input other than that I agree they need to be different :-)

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/