Re: postgres-10 with FIPS

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Aravindhan Krishnan <aravindhank11(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres-10 with FIPS
Date: 2020-12-09 09:37:39
Message-ID: CABUevEz47x=VaqORAgfScNTfdB1=pSZBhm=xoNVCZUMKeuDwKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 5:30 AM Aravindhan Krishnan <aravindhank11(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> Thanks for the responses. Since the underlying knob flip is a paid version
> and we are a SaaS based service provider, this might not align well with
> our requirement and so wanted to build postgres-10 against FIPS compliant
> ssl/crypto. The "pg_config" is of of great help in order to understand the
> build time configure options.
>

Huh? There is *nothing* in PostgreSQL that is a paid version (there is no
such thing, simply), nor in any of our open source packaging.

If you are specifically looking at the Debian or Ubuntu packages, you can
find the full packaging information in the salsa repositories at
https://salsa.debian.org/postgresql/postgresql. It will have all teh
details you need.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aravindhan Krishnan 2020-12-09 09:51:56 Re: postgres-10 with FIPS
Previous Message Lars Vonk 2020-12-09 09:20:59 Performance penalty during logical postgres replication