| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Where should I be uploading advocacy stuff? |
| Date: | 2012-08-13 10:36:08 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEz0XjdHW8Bq4oygRUySE5cwWJknOrpvAEK818yGhcq_rw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> It is possible to have public redmine projects that aren't like that,
> although... I think you have to have a second instance. That is how we do it
> at CMD, we have a public, which is open to all and then a private for
> clients but they are separate instances.
>
>> Right. We don't support that on our running instance. And it's not
>> something likely to happen.
>>
>
> Perhaps an advocacy.postgresql.org that is a public redmine? Or...
> http://www.postgresql.org/advocacy that is proxied to a public redmind (so
> we don't proliferate new urls)?
Given our experiences running this redmine, no, there is no way we're
putting up a second instance, and certainly not a public one.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-08-13 18:01:00 | Re: Where should I be uploading advocacy stuff? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2012-08-12 07:48:41 | Re: Where should I be uploading advocacy stuff? |