Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-03-11 14:18:13
Message-ID: CABUevEyydszbZJPF6iyjU45C+Kx4YSCa+KDZJkXNdjiGbE0Ojg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 3/9/18 19:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I happened to notice that if you look at
> > https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/optimizer/
> util/predtest.c.gcov.html
> > it claims that the two occurrences of
> > elog(ERROR, "predicate_classify returned a bogus value");
> > at lines 492 and 803 are reached.
> >
> > This would be quite astonishing if true, but it isn't true, since
> > the regression tests aren't reporting any such failure.
> >
> > Needless to say, this puts quite a damper on my faith in the coverage
> > reports. Maybe that machine needs a software update?
>
> I can't reproduce this locally, so yeah, maybe we should check whether
> the toolchain could be updated.
>

Is it specifically "lcov" we are considering here? If so, we are on version
1.13, and there is no newer version packaged for debian or from what I can
tell even released?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-11 17:47:55 Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-03-11 14:08:54 Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org