From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org |
Date: | 2018-03-11 14:18:13 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEyydszbZJPF6iyjU45C+Kx4YSCa+KDZJkXNdjiGbE0Ojg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 3/9/18 19:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I happened to notice that if you look at
> > https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/optimizer/
> util/predtest.c.gcov.html
> > it claims that the two occurrences of
> > elog(ERROR, "predicate_classify returned a bogus value");
> > at lines 492 and 803 are reached.
> >
> > This would be quite astonishing if true, but it isn't true, since
> > the regression tests aren't reporting any such failure.
> >
> > Needless to say, this puts quite a damper on my faith in the coverage
> > reports. Maybe that machine needs a software update?
>
> I can't reproduce this locally, so yeah, maybe we should check whether
> the toolchain could be updated.
>
Is it specifically "lcov" we are considering here? If so, we are on version
1.13, and there is no newer version packaged for debian or from what I can
tell even released?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-03-11 17:47:55 | Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-03-11 14:08:54 | Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org |