Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-03-11 17:47:55
Message-ID: 30195.1520790475@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 3/9/18 19:36, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I happened to notice that if you look at
>>> https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/optimizer/util/predtest.c.gcov.html
>>> it claims that the two occurrences of
>>> elog(ERROR, "predicate_classify returned a bogus value");
>>> at lines 492 and 803 are reached.

>> I can't reproduce this locally, so yeah, maybe we should check whether
>> the toolchain could be updated.

Now that I look, I don't see this behavior on my local machine (RHEL6,
gcc 4.4.7, lcov 1.10) either.

> Is it specifically "lcov" we are considering here? If so, we are on version
> 1.13, and there is no newer version packaged for debian or from what I can
> tell even released?

It could also be a compiler issue, I believe.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-11 17:58:21 Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2018-03-11 14:18:13 Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org