Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 9:08 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> > On 13 Feb 2024, at 20:42, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> I'm a little dubious about the "Technical References" list right below
> >> it, too. The RFC references are probably useful and stable, and maybe
> >> the wikipedia ref is OK, but I have little faith in either the
> >> stability or the long-term relevance of the other two links.
>
> > Not even those are all that stable, while the RFCs' in question haven't been
> > replaced they have all been updated with new RFC's which we don't link to. I
> > think we are better off removing them as well and leaving reading up on
> > security/crypto subject an exercise for the reader.
>
> Good point. Nuking both lists works for me.

+1.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/