| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, hanefi(dot)onaldi(at)microsoft(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation |
| Date: | 2024-02-13 20:08:24 |
| Message-ID: | 2669703.1707854904@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> On 13 Feb 2024, at 20:42, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I'm a little dubious about the "Technical References" list right below
>> it, too. The RFC references are probably useful and stable, and maybe
>> the wikipedia ref is OK, but I have little faith in either the
>> stability or the long-term relevance of the other two links.
> Not even those are all that stable, while the RFCs' in question haven't been
> replaced they have all been updated with new RFC's which we don't link to. I
> think we are better off removing them as well and leaving reading up on
> security/crypto subject an exercise for the reader.
Good point. Nuking both lists works for me.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2024-02-13 20:24:44 | Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-02-13 19:52:34 | Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation |