From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: annoying links |
Date: | 2019-04-07 15:01:16 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEyMjaA3SS2o+kahd+KDaFi0ttC0f6kxLk2MTwRiu46U6Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 4:34 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 2:59 PM Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
> > wrote:
> >> It's quite annoying to click on the links like
> >>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/9f88b5e0-6da2-5227-20d0-0d7012beaa1c(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp/
> >> and found "NOT FOUND" page.
>
> > Hmm. That is indeed quite annoying.
>
> > Do you know offhand if this is something that happend recently (in
> relation
> > to a change we made somewhere), or if it has been that way "all the
> time"?
>
> A lot of the archives' links have been like that for a long time.
> Some don't get the let's-obscure-this-email-address treatment,
> but I have no idea what the difference is.
>
That's interesting. Do you have an example of one that doesn't get broken?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-04-07 15:16:52 | Re: annoying links |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-04-07 14:34:08 | Re: annoying links |