From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Question regarding SSL code in backend and frontend |
Date: | 2012-04-06 16:27:08 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEy2QrFfqk9MU0DG97KdrGcLCBpnk0a_RkwDLCv3GmrkSA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 02:05, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> If anything, we should be changing it to TLSv1 in both client and
>> server, since every client out there now should be using that anyway,
>> given that the client has been specifying it for a long time.
>
> Huh? libpq isn't every client.
True. I guess I was just assuming that JDBC (and npgsql i think?) were
using TLS - I would assume that to be the default in both Java and
.NET. We'd have to check that before making a change of course - and
I'm not convinced we need to make the change. But if we're making a
change to align those two with each other, that's the direction the
change should be in.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-06 16:38:22 | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
Previous Message | Shigeru Hanada | 2012-04-06 16:14:31 | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |