| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
| Date: | 2012-04-06 16:38:22 |
| Message-ID: | 5700.1333730302@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> In
>> particular I do not like the specific way it's done in the v7 patch
>> (I've not looked at v8 yet) because the interposed logic has a
>> hard-wired assumption that foreign tables do not have inheritance
>> children. I think that assumption has a life expectancy measured in
>> months at most, and I don't want to have to try to fix every FDW when
>> it changes. But I think we can easily revise the hook details to fix
>> that, and I'm hoping to get that done today.
> I'll try implementing the design you suggested.
I've already got it fixed up ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-06 16:43:31 | Re: Question regarding SSL code in backend and frontend |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-04-06 16:27:08 | Re: Question regarding SSL code in backend and frontend |