From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Planet posting policy |
Date: | 2011-07-15 09:00:26 |
Message-ID: | CABUevExrm+ab6HJ_OKcwvhi_hdhfN=BaGbUgGZCRp-=f7+HeQg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 07:34, Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> I think there could be value in having both a strictly focused planet
>> and a more broader one. But I wouldn't want to *replace* the former by
>> the latter.
A separate feed would be a *requirement* if we wanted to do this,
IMHO. The current feed is syndicated on the frontpage of the main
website, we certainly want to keep that content PostgreSQL-centric..
> It is interesting, but the policy about "postgres-relevant" helps
> avoid conflicts about content of other types. I don't want to get more
> into the business of fielding questions about appropriateness of
> content on a more general feed, or censoring inappropriate content.
> Or, honestly, defining what appropriate would be on a broader planet.
>
> Seems like an epic bikeshedding opportunity.
+1(00000).
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-07-15 09:01:57 | Re: Planet posting policy |
Previous Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2011-07-15 06:34:54 | Re: Planet posting policy |