From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Planet posting policy |
Date: | 2011-07-15 09:01:57 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEx55-QCmk6rzDzuDoVOtbhh51vydWrssisWARqGdT+1uQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 20:14, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Thursday, July 14, 2011, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 07/14/2011 12:48 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> Another example would be this blog post, which planet wouldn't aggregate:
>>
>> http://www.commandprompt.com/blogs/alex_shulgin/2011/03/when_too_smart_becomes_stupid_fixing_a_ror_pgsql_driver_issue/
>>
>> The argument we got was that it was rails related, not postgresql releated. Seriously?
>
> From who? I can't see why we wouldn't accept that.
Yeah, I'd like to know that too. I searched what I could find in my
archives of the planet@ list, and saw nothing.
Because I think we *should* allow that type of post, it certainly is
postgresql related enough. IMHO, of course.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2011-07-16 05:37:49 | Re: Planet posting policy |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-07-15 09:00:26 | Re: Planet posting policy |