Re: slotname vs slot_name

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Devrim Gunduz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: slotname vs slot_name
Date: 2014-06-05 08:27:00
Message-ID: CABUevExSkHORhBtvA8-N99rOtOp4kbRL6oA4oqwf3-SR1n8NGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 5, 2014 10:22 AM, "Devrim Gündüz" <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 10:57 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > BTW, what about also renaming pg_llog directory? I'm afraid that
> > a user can confuse pg_log with pg_llog.
>
> +1. I hit this while testing 9.4 this week. Should be confusing for many
> end-users.
>

+500. We already have two directories that users remove to get free space
thinking it's safe because it's just log files. We don't need one more :-)

/Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-06-05 08:37:35 Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)
Previous Message Devrim Gündüz 2014-06-05 08:22:32 Re: slotname vs slot_name