Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)
Date: 2014-06-05 08:37:35
Message-ID: 20140605083735.GD2789@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-06-05 16:56:08 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Do we need to back-patch this to older versions (i,e. 9.2, 9.1, ..)?
> >
>
> Yes, this should be backpatched to 9.2, 9.1, 9.0, too.

I don't think it really needs to go to 9.0 - that didn't have
serializable. And before that it was fine to use serializable on a HS
standby.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-06-05 08:42:53 Re: pg_receivexlog add synchronous mode
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2014-06-05 08:27:00 Re: slotname vs slot_name