Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 9 May 2016 at 18:42, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
>> 3. pglogical will probably reach release quality before next year,
>>
>>> making this release the "hot upgrade" release.
>>>
>>
>> I think it's dangerous to bet on something like that. While I certainly
>> hope and think it will be, we certainly don't know.
>>
>
> We don't know Postgres 9.6 will be release quality either by Sept, but we
> are taking to steps to ensure it is.
>
> The question is whether others take an interest in doing the same thing
> for pglogical. I suggest that it is more about acceptance of the technology
> than it is about software quality, which is easy to measure. Perhaps that
> is just a matter of time.
>
>
I agree with that.

It's hard enough to predict what will be release quality by Sept. We should
not base our marketing efforts on what we think will happen *another year*
in the future. We should push that marketing effort then, when we have the
product.

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/