From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode |
Date: | 2012-09-04 13:52:28 |
Message-ID: | CABUevExE2j1agkY+e0aT1-Y3my6dXBayEmeJ7AWbQ1+c+HTycA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> On Aug 28, 2012 9:59 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> Well, why don't we just s/restoring/processing/ in the debug message,
>>>> and call it good?
>
>> Are we "allowed" to backpatch things to 9.2 at this point that changes
>> strings for translators?
>
> Well, not being a translator I'm not sure that I get a vote.
> But I'd think this is too minor to justify back-patching it.
Probably - that's why I didn't even consider going back beyond 9.2.
Anyway; I'll just leave it at master.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-04 14:35:07 | Re: Some whitespaces in utility.c |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-04 13:51:44 | Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode |