From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | pg_control read error message |
Date: | 2018-05-18 11:32:41 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEx8ZRV5Ut_FvP2etXiQppx3xVzm7oOaV3AcdHxX81Yt8Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
If pg_control is for some reason empty, we give an error messagfe like:
2018-05-18 13:24:03.342 CEST [19697] PANIC: could not read from control
file: Success
Which is, uh, wrong -- it's definitely not successful.
Obviously this is a state where the user is fairly screwed anyway, but we
should give a better message.
Attached is a patch that does this. Reasonable?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pg_control_error.patch | text/x-patch | 1.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Naylor | 2018-05-18 11:49:15 | Re: master fails to build on Windows |
Previous Message | John Naylor | 2018-05-18 10:53:34 | Re: inconsistency and inefficiency in setup_conversion() |