| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is the last 9.1 release planned? |
| Date: | 2016-10-05 05:37:33 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEw-NCx9KP9W3ir6eXHiu+qfEQFDvY60Ntf_2Xr-AbnonQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Oct 5, 2016 5:42 AM, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <
tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Jaime Casanova
> > Well, no. We normally don't give special treatment to any minor release
> > not even if it is going to die.
> > What normally happens is that all minor releases are released the same
day.
> >
> > Taken your example, that same day were released: 9.0.23, 9.1.19, 9.2.14,
> > 9.3.10 and 9.4.5
> >
>
> Thanks for clarification. Then, I understood that the expression "stop
releases in September" in the release note and a pgsql-announce mail was
not correct.
It basically means stop guaranteeing that we do. As of a couple of days
ago, bug fixes won't necessarily be back ported to 9.1 if they are
difficult. But there will be one wrap-up release in November with any
patches that have already been applied but have not yet been in a release.
And after November, we will stop doing that as well.
/Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2016-10-05 05:51:55 | Re: Aggregation push down, reorder of join and group by |
| Previous Message | Chenxi Li | 2016-10-05 05:19:07 | Aggregation push down, reorder of join and group by |