| From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Jaime Casanova' <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is the last 9.1 release planned? |
| Date: | 2016-10-05 03:41:57 |
| Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F5F7D88@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Jaime Casanova
> Well, no. We normally don't give special treatment to any minor release
> not even if it is going to die.
> What normally happens is that all minor releases are released the same day.
>
> Taken your example, that same day were released: 9.0.23, 9.1.19, 9.2.14,
> 9.3.10 and 9.4.5
>
Thanks for clarification. Then, I understood that the expression "stop releases in September" in the release note and a pgsql-announce mail was not correct.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2016-10-05 03:48:51 | Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscription |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2016-10-05 03:22:49 | Re: Is the last 9.1 release planned? |