Re: Shmem queue is not flushed if receiver is not yet attached

From: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shmem queue is not flushed if receiver is not yet attached
Date: 2022-05-30 07:07:51
Message-ID: CABOikdON_xozPaWZNVAPKLmVYRGQkoEwa-mZjR1U21k9Rh9KFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 7:01 AM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> I have a problem that is also related to shmem queue [1], however, I cannot
> reproduce it. How did you reproduce this problem?
>
>
I discovered this bug while working on an extension that makes use of the
shared memory queue facility. Not sure how useful that is for your purpose.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb..com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-05-30 07:48:22 Re: Remove support for Visual Studio 2013
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2022-05-30 07:06:14 Re: Shmem queue is not flushed if receiver is not yet attached