From: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Backporting BackgroundPsql |
Date: | 2024-07-01 14:11:35 |
Message-ID: | CABOikdOBLm_2dpy8qz+zuFZBZGz=GJ60=gNd=vS51Lp2NanwNw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
H i Daniel,
On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 1:09 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> > On 29 Jun 2024, at 06:38, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > Don't we need to add install and uninstall rules for the new module,
> like we did in
> https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a4c17c86176cfa712f541b81b2a026ae054b275e
> and
> https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7039c7cff6736780c3bbb41a90a6dfea0f581ad2
> ?
>
> Thats correct, we should backport those as well.
>
Thanks for confirming. Attaching patches for PG15 and PG14, but this will
need backporting all the way up to PG12.
Thanks,
Pavan
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Fix-missing-installation-uninstallation-rules-for-Ba-PG14.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.6 KB |
0001-Fix-missing-installation-uninstallation-rules-for-Ba-PG15.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-07-01 14:19:55 | Re: Should we move the resowner field from JitContext to LLVMJitContext? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-07-01 14:08:23 | Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock |