Re: Backporting BackgroundPsql

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Backporting BackgroundPsql
Date: 2024-07-01 07:39:25
Message-ID: AA7C19F9-998F-4F43-B835-E866E5A7B06F@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 29 Jun 2024, at 06:38, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Don't we need to add install and uninstall rules for the new module, like we did in https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a4c17c86176cfa712f541b81b2a026ae054b275e and https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7039c7cff6736780c3bbb41a90a6dfea0f581ad2 ?

Thats correct, we should backport those as well.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ajin Cherian 2024-07-01 07:47:07 Re: Conflict Detection and Resolution
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-07-01 07:35:09 Re: [PATCH] Fix docs to use canonical links