Re: Database.Schema.Table

Thank you for the clarification David. I really thought this would be
easier to implement since rest of the architecture (within DB) doesn't need
any (or little) change.

Max.

On Sat, Jul 20, 2019, 19:35 David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Saturday, July 20, 2019, jmz <mxav1111(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Does any one know if database.schema.table syntax would make it to
>> Release 12?
>>
>
> No. The lack of an entry in the beta release notes (or relevant
> documentation) and probably the same error when attempting it on version 12
> makes this clear.
>
> There is no pending patch or even, IIRC, recent discussion on making this
> potentially a thing. My understanding is the current architecture of the
> product makes implementing such a capability prohibitively expensive in
> terms of both time and risk.
>
> David J.
>
>