From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Brian Cloutier <brian(at)citusdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add PGDLLIMPORT lines to some variables |
Date: | 2017-11-28 22:51:36 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTmCxr+Owoc4ky-JS0Uy-SdStm3yu6zXczGTZRxfu-aLQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Brian Cloutier <brian(at)citusdata(dot)com> wrote:
> Sorry, I'm new to pg-hackers, so I'm not sure what the next step is.
>
> Do I submit this to commitfest?
>
> When submitting, do I submit multiple changes, one per branch this should be
> packported to?
If you want a patch to get reviewed, please register it to the commit
fest? Here are more details:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
Sending as a first step only one patch for HEAD is fine, as discussion
will likely occur while you work on a patch. If the patch is worth
back-patching, usually the committer who picks up the patch would
generate the versions for the back-branches. Help is always
appreciated with version-specific patches once it is clearly decided
that a certain patch merits a backpatch. Note that PGDLLIMPORT does
not have this treatment usually.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-28 22:57:48 | Re: pgindent run? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-11-28 22:42:22 | Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 |