| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 |
| Date: | 2017-11-28 22:42:22 |
| Message-ID: | 6de87398-a9da-aa8b-a4c2-ca06ef8d757c@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On 11/28/17 17:33, Michael Paquier wrote:
> 1) Have a special value in the parameter saslchannelbinding proposed
> in patch 0001. For example by specifying "none" then no channel
> binding is used.
I was thinking if it's empty then don't use channel binding. Right now,
empty means the same thing as tls-unique. In any case, some variant of
that should be fine. I don't think we need a separate server option
that this point.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-28 22:51:36 | Re: Add PGDLLIMPORT lines to some variables |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-11-28 22:41:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Small improvement to compactify_tuples |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-29 02:05:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Statement-level rollback |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-28 22:33:10 | Re: [JDBC] [HACKERS] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 |