Re: pg_rewind confusion

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_rewind confusion
Date: 2016-07-21 23:35:32
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTeC6SY+fHyph7=KxJP=LWjWbvWpio_DvpQnzDwUssRkg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:11:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> + Copy all other files such as <filename>clog</filename> and
>> clog is not a term used a lot in the docs. It may be better to refer
>> to pg_clog, or transaction status data.
>
> Agreed, changed to "pg_clog".
>
> Updated patch attached.

Thanks. That looks fine to me. This documentation becomes really clearer.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerome Wagner 2016-07-26 09:20:35 question on parsing postgres sql queries
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-07-21 17:15:09 Re: pg_rewind confusion