Re: pg_rewind confusion

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_rewind confusion
Date: 2016-08-01 16:52:51
Message-ID: 20160801165251.GC28246@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 08:35:32AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:11:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> + Copy all other files such as <filename>clog</filename> and
> >> clog is not a term used a lot in the docs. It may be better to refer
> >> to pg_clog, or transaction status data.
> >
> > Agreed, changed to "pg_clog".
> >
> > Updated patch attached.
>
> Thanks. That looks fine to me. This documentation becomes really clearer.

Patch applied to head only as this did not fix any documentation bugs.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-08-02 17:23:45 NOTIFY man page still recommends rules
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-07-31 01:34:39 Re: Wording in Error Message Style Guide