| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jankirk(dot)Vincent(dot), Jamison" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: On Judging the Value of Tests |
| Date: | 2017-11-24 06:59:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTTSFQ7p2k-L+TJqGOivW-_uwEU9r_5yub7zy3X1Miv-w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Jankirk.Vincent., Jamison
<k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> I will take note of all your advice. I think it's because I've noticed that a lot of functions and lines are still not covered by tests (https://coverage.postgresql.org/) so I feel like I want to work on tests first while I'm still learning the PG internals and hacking.
That's a good idea to get more familiar with the internals of
Postgres. Don't forget to submit any patch you would like to get
integrated into -hackers and to get it registered in the commit fest
application. Please see here for more details:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2017-11-24 07:15:01 | Re: pg_total_relation_size accuracy guarantee |
| Previous Message | Jankirk.Vincent., Jamison | 2017-11-24 01:27:02 | RE: On Judging the Value of Tests |