From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Nikita <jne100(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_total_relation_size accuracy guarantee |
Date: | 2017-11-24 07:15:01 |
Message-ID: | 1511507701.2469.5.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Nikita wrote:
> 1. pg_total_relation_size return predictable approximately correct table size (apart from some preallocation) without subsequent VACUUM/ANALYZE/anything call as long as I don't DELETE/UPDATE rows;
>
> 2. DROP/TRUNCATE table reclaim disc space without subsequent VACUUM;
>
> These assumptions are correct? Is it fixed in doc if so?
Sort of, if you consider the source as documentation.
Ad pg_total_relation_size:
See the function definition in backend/utils/adt/dbsize.c and
the functions that it calls, especially "calculate_relation_size":
PostgreSQL uses the stat(2) system call to determine the actual
size of the files on disk.
Ad TRUNCATE (from backend/commands/tablecmds.c):
/*
* Need the full transaction-safe pushups.
*
* Create a new empty storage file for the relation, and assign it
* as the relfilenode value. The old storage file is scheduled for
* deletion at commit.
*/
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikita | 2017-11-24 10:52:19 | Re: pg_total_relation_size accuracy guarantee |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-11-24 06:59:19 | Re: On Judging the Value of Tests |