Re: pgsql: Fix bogus size calculation introduced by commit cc5f81366.

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> While googling around trying to find where I could read Coverity's
> output myself I was intrigued to see that https://scan.coverity.com
> offers integration with Travis CI[1], which suggests the possibility
> of automatically scanning all Commitfest submissions. The trouble is
> that for projects over 1 million lines of code they limit scans to one
> per day, so it'd take over 200 days to get through the current
> Commitfest, assuming no one ever posted new versions or committed
> anything in the meantime. Hah. I guess Coverity analysis is going to
> have to remain post-commit only.

There are a mountain of false positives to take care of when doing the
initial scanning of a new project. So while the initial cost is high,
this would be maintainable in the long term if there is a continuous
effort put into it. The limit due to the project size sucks, but at
least this lets us know that coverity is not a solution for the CF.
Careful review is able to remove most of the problems anyway.
--
Michael