| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing |
| Date: | 2017-04-22 14:31:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTKcKVx9yO7Lt56Nd0yEF+5otY3XySDST=+iEYYhqcOPg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info> wrote:
> Following your advice, I went through the source tree and cleaned up most
> instances of that pattern.
> I have attached the corresponding patch to this mail.
> If you think this patch is indeed interesting, what would be the next way to
> have it reviewed ?
Here are the general guidelines about patch submission:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
And the best thing would be to register it to the next commit fest so
as it does not get lost:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-22 15:41:01 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-04-22 14:29:10 | Re: Old versions of Test::More |