From: | Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Small patch for pg_basebackup argument parsing |
Date: | 2017-04-22 16:46:26 |
Message-ID: | 13468936.jO5Y3CKu5e@peanuts2 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Saturday, April 22, 2017 11:31:58 PM CEST Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info>
wrote:
> > Following your advice, I went through the source tree and cleaned up most
> > instances of that pattern.
> > I have attached the corresponding patch to this mail.
> > If you think this patch is indeed interesting, what would be the next way
> > to have it reviewed ?
>
> Here are the general guidelines about patch submission:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
> And the best thing would be to register it to the next commit fest so
> as it does not get lost:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/
Thank you, I added an entry in the next commit fest.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-22 17:51:30 | A note about debugging TAP failures |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-22 16:37:50 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Replication lag tracking for walsenders |