| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Date: | 2016-10-03 04:26:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT5Wa5G5v32FLe_pJGs-hz5_6Dz2KeWdR0TLbbykADQXA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I removed DEPENDENCY_IGNORE. Does the following look good or am I still
>> missing something?
>
> You missed your commit message, but otherwise looks fine.
I have moved this patch to next CF because that's fresh, but switched
the patch as "waiting on author". Be careful, the patch was in "needs
review".
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-10-03 04:31:41 | Re: raw output from copy |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-10-03 04:25:17 | Re: asynchronous and vectorized execution |