| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Date: | 2016-10-03 04:45:30 |
| Message-ID: | 378ecca4-303c-b5cb-ba1f-a0ee5e545bf2@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/10/03 13:26, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Amit Langote
>> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> I removed DEPENDENCY_IGNORE. Does the following look good or am I still
>>> missing something?
>>
>> You missed your commit message, but otherwise looks fine.
>
> I have moved this patch to next CF because that's fresh, but switched
> the patch as "waiting on author". Be careful, the patch was in "needs
> review".
Thanks Michael. I was going to post the patch addressing Robert's
comments today, which I will anyway. Then I will switch the status back
to "Needs Review", albeit as part of the next CF.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-10-03 04:51:50 | Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-10-03 04:44:40 | Re: pg_xlogdump follow into the future |