From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14849: jsonb_build_object doesn't like VARIADIC calls very much |
Date: | 2017-10-22 20:35:38 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSx01yLR0OkO0rH7=4ojX9DbyAC9hactuCDGjQmMg3MzQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/22/2017 12:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> On 10/21/2017 07:33 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> I don't think collecting all the arguments is particularly special ---
>>>> format() or concat() for instance could possibly use this. You might
>>>> need an option to say what to do with unknown.
>>> In this case, we could just use a boolean flag to decide if TEXTOID
>>> should be enforced or not.
>> A generic function is going to look a little more complicated than this,
>> though. The functions as coded assume that the function has a single
>> variadic argument. But for it to be useful generically it really needs
>> to be able to work where there are both fixed and variadic arguments (a
>> la printf style functions).
>>
>> I guess a simple way would be to make the caller tell the function where
>> the variadic arguments start, or how many to skip, something like that.
Sorry for the late reply, I was taking a long flight. Yes, that's
actually the conclusion I am reaching when looking at the code by
adding an argument to mark when the variadic arguments start. The
headers of funcapi.h and funcapi.c need also a cleanup.
> here's a patch that works that way, based on Michael's code.
Patch not attached :)
I still have a patch half-cooked, that I can send if necessary, but
you are on it, right?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-10-22 20:50:00 | Re: BUG #14849: jsonb_build_object doesn't like VARIADIC calls very much |
Previous Message | Chris Hanks | 2017-10-22 19:23:40 | Re: Connections hang indefinitely while taking a LWLockTranche buffer_content lock. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-10-22 20:50:00 | Re: BUG #14849: jsonb_build_object doesn't like VARIADIC calls very much |
Previous Message | Eric Ridge | 2017-10-22 20:00:47 | Re: How to determine that a TransactionId is really aborted? |