> On Oct 22, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Eric Ridge <eebbrr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Can anyone confirm or deny that this is correct? I feel like it is correct, but I'm no expert.
>
> What are you going to use the code for? I think that that context is
> likely to matter here.
I'm not exactly sure yet, but I'm thinking about storing transaction ids externally and then regularly poking Postgres to see which ones are aborted-and-no-longer-considered-visible so I can clean up my external list.
eric