Re: [HACKERS] CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stas Kelvich <stas(dot)kelvich(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CUBE seems a bit confused about ORDER BY
Date: 2017-11-29 12:38:41
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSuaAg+wZvi1t2MsihWqm6zC-c1bcPPy4Fo5cKAr-+iuw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Sure, patch got some review. I've no objection against moving this to the
> next commitfest though.

Please note that as this is qualified as a bug fix, I was not going to
mark it as returned with feedback or such. We want to keep track of
fixes that are bugs and potentially need back-patching.

> Since, these patches include bug fix, it's possible that someone will commit
> it before next commitfest.

Sure. Committers are free to commit patches they see suited for
integration even out of the CF time.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-11-29 12:58:55 Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2017-11-29 12:30:48 es_query_dsa is broken