Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
Date: 2014-12-09 01:10:50
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSaE01EXw6wJfdFOpxpG4N527vZfJM_OtXg6qZhhd3X8Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Adding on top of that a couple of things cleaned up, like docs and
> typos, and I got the patch attached. Let's have a committer have a
> look a it now, I am marking that as "Ready for Committer".
For the archives, this has been committed as fe263d1. Thanks Simon for
looking and the final push. And sorry that I didn't spot the issue
with tap tests when reviewing, check-world passed but my dev VM missed
necessary perl packages.
Regards,
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-12-09 01:42:18 Re: pg_recvlogical description
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-12-08 23:19:41 Re: On partitioning