Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, furuyao(at)pm(dot)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots
Date: 2014-10-04 23:03:06
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSMGCqohtdXV31uKxPieV-2d_MaxA+q2Y=pgLRudfAxBg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Any opinion on whether we should accept both --create and --create-slot
> or only the latter? Accepting both would get rid of problems due to
> potential usages of the old syntax - and it's easier to type...
My vote goes for only --create-slot and --drop-slot.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-10-05 01:03:17 Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-10-04 22:03:54 Re: NEXT VALUE FOR <sequence>