| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, furuyao(at)pm(dot)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots |
| Date: | 2014-10-05 01:03:17 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaW6AcZM0bSCT6nEN02o5qgR6qVUT8y7uLrS=x5qx8XXw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Any opinion on whether we should accept both --create and --create-slot
>> or only the latter? Accepting both would get rid of problems due to
>> potential usages of the old syntax - and it's easier to type...
> My vote goes for only --create-slot and --drop-slot.
Ditto.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2014-10-05 01:07:55 | Re: NEXT VALUE FOR <sequence> |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-10-04 23:03:06 | Re: pg_receivexlog and replication slots |