| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_ctl/pg_rewind tests vs. slow AIX buildfarm members |
| Date: | 2015-10-06 22:06:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqS06r0ZE9gGZTc6pX=KFCf=J_NbMVNcCmq3hiWEWyyvMw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> So the attached modified patch adjusts the PID-match logic and some
>>> comments, but is otherwise what I posted before. I believe that this
>>> might actually work on Windows, but I have no way to test it. Someone
>>> please try that? (Don't forget to test the service-start path, too.)
>>
>> Has anyone tried that patch on Windows? I'd like to push it in hopes of
>> improving buildfarm stability, but I'm hesitant to do so without some
>> confirmation that it acts as I think it will.
>
> I marked this patch as something to look at, though I haven't take the
> time to do it yet...
s/take/taken
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-10-06 22:10:03 | Re: Odd query execution behavior with extended protocol |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-10-06 22:05:42 | Re: pg_ctl/pg_rewind tests vs. slow AIX buildfarm members |