Re: pg_ctl/pg_rewind tests vs. slow AIX buildfarm members

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl/pg_rewind tests vs. slow AIX buildfarm members
Date: 2015-10-06 22:05:42
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQs0aYB7jBnbfDzK2AjRHHiRjmp4GgeRnko=_cBrexA3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> So the attached modified patch adjusts the PID-match logic and some
>> comments, but is otherwise what I posted before. I believe that this
>> might actually work on Windows, but I have no way to test it. Someone
>> please try that? (Don't forget to test the service-start path, too.)
>
> Has anyone tried that patch on Windows? I'd like to push it in hopes of
> improving buildfarm stability, but I'm hesitant to do so without some
> confirmation that it acts as I think it will.

I marked this patch as something to look at, though I haven't take the
time to do it yet...
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-10-06 22:06:07 Re: pg_ctl/pg_rewind tests vs. slow AIX buildfarm members
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-10-06 22:01:43 Re: Obsolete comment in tidpath.c